Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 04:12

What’s next?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Dollar General CEO turns heads with earnings-call comments - TheStreet
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Dinosaur Fossils Unlock Clues to Cancer’s Ancient Origins - SciTechDaily
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Top-Rated Biotech Surges On A Bullish Win In Cancer - Investor's Business Daily
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
How and why do cats purr? Scientists finally found the answers - Earth.com
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Has a cop ever said something to you which was completely unexpected?
Thank you.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?